The Influence of People, Process, and Physical Evidence on the Decision to Choose Telecommunication Services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64803/cessmuds.v1.25Keywords:
People, Process, Physical Evidence, Consumer Decision and Telecommunication ServicesAbstract
This study aims to analyze the influence of People, Process, and Physical Evidence on consumers’ decisions to choose telecommunication services. In the era of digital communication, the competition among telecommunication companies is increasingly intense, with similar products and pricing structures offered by various providers. Therefore, service quality and the extended marketing mix elements play a crucial role in determining consumer preferences. The research employs a quantitative approach with data collected through questionnaires distributed to users of major telecommunication providers such as Telkomsel, XL, and Indosat. The variables include People (employee competence, friendliness, responsiveness), Process (service procedures, responsiveness, and complaint handling), and Physical Evidence (store design, website appearance, and supporting facilities). The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression to determine both partial and simultaneous effects. The results indicate that the three variables—People, Process, and Physical Evidence—have a positive and significant influence on the decision to choose telecommunication services, either partially or simultaneously. Among them, the Process variable has the most dominant effect, suggesting that efficient and transparent service procedures are key determinants in consumer choice. This study highlights the importance of managing service quality holistically, not only through product and price but also through human interaction, operational efficiency, and tangible service attributes, to enhance competitiveness and customer loyalty in the telecommunication industry.
References
Abedian, M., Amindoust, A., Maddahi, R., & Jouzdani, J. (2022). A game theory approach to selecting marketing-mix strategies. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 19(1), 139-158.
Andronie, M., Lăzăroiu, G., Ștefănescu, R., Ionescu, L., & Cocoșatu, M. (2021). Neuromanagement decision-making and cognitive algorithmic processes in the technological adoption of mobile commerce apps. Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(4), 1033-1062.
Azizi, S., & Naeli, M. (2024). Internal Marketing Mix Operationalization: A Review of the Literature. Internal Marketing: Issues and Perspectives for Internal Customer-Centric Management: Internal Marketing, 155-185.
Hampton, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2023). Choices for climate action: A review of the multiple roles individuals play. One Earth, 6(9), 1157-1172.
Jackman, M., Sakzewski, L., Morgan, C., Boyd, R. N., Brennan, S. E., Langdon, K., ... & Novak, I. (2022). Interventions to improve physical function for children and young people with cerebral palsy: international clinical practice guideline. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 64(5), 536-549.
Juhaidi, A. (2024). Social media marketing of Islamic higher education institution in Indonesia: a marketing mix perspective. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2374864.
Kalliampakou, I., & Antonopoulou, H. (2025). The influence of emotional intelligence on consumer decision-making: Insights from recent studies. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 67, 451.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
Kubicki, M. (2023). Il marketing mix: Padroneggiare le 4 P del marketing. 50Minutos. es.
Liao, J., & Huang, J. (2024). Think like a robot: How interactions with humanoid service robots affect consumers’ decision strategies. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 76, 103575.
Lim, W. M. (2021). A marketing mix typology for integrated care: the 10 Ps. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 29(5), 453-469.
Lovelock, C., & Wirtz, J. (2016). Services Marketing: People, Technology, Strategy (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Ni, X., Yan, L., Xiong, K., & Liu, Y. (2024). A hierarchical Bayesian market mix model with caus.
Santos, S., & Gonçalves, H. M. (2021). The consumer decision journey: A literature review of the foundational models and theories and a future perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121117.
Tho'in, M., Muliasari, D., & Putri, S. A. R. (2021). An analysis of customer satisfaction levels in islamic banks based on marketing mix as a measurement tool. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25(1), 2004-2011.
Qin, H., Peak, D. A., & Prybutok, V. (2021). A virtual market in your pocket: How does mobile augmented reality (MAR) influence consumer decision making?. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58, 102337.
Yang, J., Xiu, P., Sun, L., Ying, L., & Muthu, B. (2022). Social media data analytics for business decision making system to competitive analysis. Information Processing & Management, 59(1), 102751.
Yun, J. H., Lee, E. J., & Kim, D. H. (2021). Behavioral and neural evidence on consumer responses to human doctors and medical artificial intelligence. Psychology & Marketing, 38(4), 610-625.
Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J., & Gremler, D. D. (2018). Services Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus Across the Firm (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fairuza Rikha Amri (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





