Literature Review: Information System Audits as Instruments for Improving Governance and Service Quality in Public Organizations

Authors

  • Lita Hepika Ginting Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi Author
  • Dini Sapira br Sembiring Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi Author
  • Siti Khairunnisa Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi Author
  • Fadilah Nasution Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi Author
  • Neng Sri Wardhani Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64803/cessmuds.v1.114
   

Keywords:

Information System Audit, COBIT, IT Governance, Public Services

Abstract

Information systems audit plays a strategic role in ensuring that information technology use in public organizations is effective, secure, and aligned with institutional objectives. The increasing adoption of information systems in the public service sector, including libraries, requires systematic evaluation mechanisms to control information technology risks and improve service quality. This study aims to examine the role of information systems audit in supporting information technology governance in public organizations by synthesizing findings from previous studies. This research employs a qualitative descriptive approach, drawing on a literature review. The results indicate that information systems audits, particularly those using the COBIT framework, are effective in identifying gaps in IT governance, enhancing accountability in information system management, and supporting continuous improvement of public service quality.

References

[18.33, 30/12/2025] Lita Hepika Ginting: Aleksi, A., & Afrina, M. (2023). Measuring IT service maturity in university libraries using the COBIT 2019 framework. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 11(3), 389–398.

De Haes, S., Van Grembergen, W., & Debreceny, R. S. (2020). COBIT as a framework for enterprise governance of IT. Information Systems Management, 37(4), 316–325.

ISACA. (2019). COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives. ISACA.

ISACA. (2020). COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Technology Governance Solution. ISACA.

Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2020). Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm (16th ed.). Pearson Education.

MODEM. (2024). Information systems audit of public library services using the COBIT 5 framework. MODEM Journal, 1(3), 34–51.

Mulyadi, D., Prasetyo, E., & Hidayat, R. (2021). Digital transformation and IT governance in public sector organizations. Government Information Quarterly, 38(2), 101547.

Putra, S. D., Herman, H., & Yudhana, A. (2023). IT governance audit of academic information systems using COBIT 2019. Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 10(3), 467–474.

Rabhani, P., Suryanto, T., & Nugroho, E. (2020). Information systems audit using the COBIT 5 framework. Jurnal SISFOKOM, 9(2), 275–280.

Rahayu, D., Nugroho, Y., & Pratama, A. R. (2021). IT governance practices in public sector organizations: A systematic review. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4), 101603.

Salleh, K. A., & Janczewski, L. (2016). Information systems audit: A value-added approach. Journal of Information Systems Audit and Control, 2(1), 1–14.

Van Grembergen, W., & De Haes, S. (2018). Enterprise Governance of Information Technology (2nd ed.). Springer.

Wahyuni, S., Sari, N., & Prabowo, H. (2022). Digital library services and information systems audit in public institutions. Library Management, 43(6/7), 451–465.

Wilkin, C. L., & Chenhall, R. H. (2016). A review of IT governance: A taxonomy to inform accounting information systems. Journal of Information Systems, 30(2), 63–99.

[18.34, 30/12/2025] Lita Hepika Ginting: Debreceny, R. S., & Gray, G. L. (2016). IT governance and process maturity: A multinational field study. Journal of Information Systems, 30(1), 157–188.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Literature Review: Information System Audits as Instruments for Improving Governance and Service Quality in Public Organizations. (2025). Proceedings of The International Conference on Computer Science, Engineering, Social Science, and Multi-Disciplinary Studies, 1, 584-586. https://doi.org/10.64803/cessmuds.v1.114