Collaborative AI Governance for Digital Innovation and Knowledge Integration Performance

Authors

  • Umar Hamdan Nasution Universitas Dharmawangsa Author
  • Cut Zahri Universitas Dharmawangsa Author
  • M. Arif Rahman Universitas Dharmawangsa Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64803/cessmuds.v1.11
   

Keywords:

AI governance, knowledge integration capability, digital innovation capability, innovation performance, digital ecosystem, dynamic capability theory

Abstract

 The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has significantly transformed organizational strategies in managing knowledge resources, decision-making processes, and innovation activities within digital ecosystems. AI enables organizations to process large-scale data, generate predictive insights, and improve strategic responsiveness in increasingly dynamic environments. However, the successful implementation of AI does not rely solely on technological readiness, but also requires governance mechanisms that ensure transparency, accountability, fairness, and ethical use of data. Without appropriate governance structures, AI adoption may generate risks related to algorithmic bias, data misuse, lack of explainability, and reduced organizational trust. This study aims to develop an empirical model explaining the relationship between collaborative AI governance, knowledge integration capability, digital innovation capability, and innovation performance. The research is grounded in Resource-Based View (RBV) and Dynamic Capability Theory, which emphasize that organizational capabilities play an important role in creating sustainable competitive advantage. AI governance is conceptualized as a strategic capability that enables organizations to integrate knowledge resources and support innovation processes. Knowledge integration capability reflects the organizational ability to combine data, expertise, and digital resources into new value creation mechanisms, while digital innovation capability represents the ability to transform technological knowledge into innovative products, services, and business models. This study adopts a quantitative research approach using survey data collected from 210 respondents consisting of managers, IT professionals, and digital transformation specialists from organizations implementing AI-based technologies. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to evaluate measurement validity, reliability, and structural relationships among variables. The findings indicate that collaborative AI governance has a significant positive effect on knowledge integration capability, which subsequently enhances digital innovation capability and innovation performance. The results highlight the importance of governance mechanisms in ensuring responsible AI adoption and strengthening organizational innovation outcomes. This study contributes to the literature by integrating AI governance and knowledge integration capability into a unified empirical framework explaining innovation performance in digital ecosystems. The findings also provide practical implications for organizations seeking to improve innovation capability through responsible AI governance strategies 

References

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained

competitive advantage. Journal of

Management, 17(1), 99–120.

https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Benbya, H., Nan, N., Tanriverdi, H., & Yoo, Y.

(2020). Complexity and information systems

research in the emerging digital world. MIS

Quarterly, 44(1), 1–17.

https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/13304

Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). The business

of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business

Review.

https://hbr.org/2017/07/the-business-ofartificial-intelligence

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G.,

Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R.,

Edwards, J., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan,

P., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A., Kizgin, H.,

Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., &

Williams, M. (2023). So what if ChatGPT

wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on

opportunities, challenges and implications of

generative AI. International Journal of

Information Management, 71, 102642.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.10264

2

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R.,

Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C.,

Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B.,

Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—

An ethical framework for a good AI society.

Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based

theory of the firm. Strategic Management

Journal, 17(S2), 109–122.

https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M.

(2022). A primer on partial least squares

structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd

ed.). Sage.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Janssen, M., Brous, P., Estevez, E., Barbosa, L., &

Janowski, T. (2020). Data governance:

Organizing data for trustworthy Artificial

Intelligence. Government Information

Quarterly, 37(3), 101493.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101493

Kraus, S., Schiavone, F., Pluzhnikova, A., &

Invernizzi, A. (2021). Digital transformation in

entrepreneurship: A systematic literature

review. Journal of Business Research, 123,

124–136.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.035

Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019).

The digital transformation of innovation and

entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 48(8),

103773.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.001

Rai, A., Constantinides, P., & Sarker, S. (2019). Nextgeneration digital platforms: Toward human–

AI hybrids. MIS Quarterly, 43(1), iii–x.

https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/43:1.03

Ransbotham, S., Kiron, D., LaFountain, B.,

Khodabandeh, S., & Chu, M. (2023).

Achieving individual and organizational value

with AI. MIT Sloan Management Review.

https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/achievingindividual-and-organizational-value-with-ai/

Teece, D. J., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic

capabilities and organizational agility.

California Management Review, 58(4), 13–35.

https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13

Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y.,

Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J., Fabian, N., &

Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A

multidisciplinary reflection. Journal of

Business Research, 122, 889–901.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022

Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital

transformation: A review and research agenda.

Journal of Strategic Information Systems,

28(2), 118–144.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003

Wamba, S. F., Gunasekaran, A., Akter, S., Ren, S.,

Dubey, R., & Childe, S. (2020). Big data

analytics and firm performance: Effects of

dynamic capabilities. Journal of Business

Research, 70, 356–365.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.009

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Collaborative AI Governance for Digital Innovation and Knowledge Integration Performance. (2025). Proceedings of The International Conference on Computer Science, Engineering, Social Science, and Multi-Disciplinary Studies, 1, 60-64. https://doi.org/10.64803/cessmuds.v1.11