Comparative Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting and Weighted Product Methods for Faculty Integrity Zone Ranking

Authors

  • Sri Dewi Medan State University Author
  • Ichwanul Muslim Karo Karo Medan State University Author
  • Eviyona Laurenta Br Barus Medan State University Author
       

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64803/cessmuds.v1.157

Keywords:

Decision Support System, SAW, WP, Integrity Zone

Abstract

Evaluating and ranking Faculty Integrity Zone units is a crucial process to support governance quality, transparency, and accountability in higher education institutions. However, manual evaluation processes are often time-consuming and prone to subjectivity. Therefore, this study aims to design and implement a Decision Support System (DSS) using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weighted Product (WP) methods to perform an objective and systematic ranking of Faculty Integrity Zone units. The system was developed using the System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) with the Waterfall model, consisting of requirement analysis, system design, implementation, testing, and deployment stages. Research data were obtained from Integrity Zone assessment criteria applied to faculty units at Universitas Negeri Medan. The results indicate that both SAW and WP methods are capable of generating consistent and reliable ranking outcomes, with the Faculty of Education (FIP) achieving the highest rank in both methods. While SAW provides stable and easily interpretable results through linear weighted aggregation, WP demonstrates higher sensitivity to variations in criterion values due to its multiplicative approach. Overall, the developed DSS effectively supports decision-making in evaluating Faculty Integrity Zones and can be utilized as a strategic tool to enhance institutional governance performance.

References

M. Farid, T. Ibrahim, Hasbiyallah, and O. Arifudin, “Mekanisme Pengambilan Keputusan Berbasis Sistem Informasi Manajemen Dalam Lembaga Pendidikan Islam,” J. Tahsinia, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 86–103, 2025.

I. G. I. Sudipa, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://repository.usahid.ac.id/2707/1/ Buku - Sistem Pendukung Keputusan - Tatan_Sukwika.pdf

N. Aurelia, T. Murti, G, A. Putri, R, and M. Qodryanto, R, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan (Decision Support System) Disusun,” JJurnal Ilm. Teknol. Inf. Inst. Teknol. Sepuluh Nop., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–98, 2022, [Online]. Available: file: ///D:/SMT 6/SKP/Buku_Panduan_SPK.pdf%0D

E. L. B. Dewi, Sri; Karo, Ichwanul Muslim Karo; Barus, “SISTEM PERANGKINGAN MENENTUKAN FAKULTAS TERBAIK PENERAPAN ZONA INTEGRITAS MENGGUNAKAN METODE SAW,” J. Teknol. terpadu, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 20–26, 2025.

S. H. Hadad, M. H. Abdullah, Nurnela, and R. H. Hairun, “Multi Attribute Decision Making Penentuan Dosen Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Multi-Objective Optimization by Ratio Analysis dan Surrogate Weighting,” J. Ilm. Inform. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 24–35, 2024, doi: 10.58602/jima-ilkom.v3i1.24.

A. Arifin and R. A. Fadillah, “Implementasi metode attribute decission making untuk menentukan kawasan penanaman bakau,” J. Sains, Teknol. dan Ind., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 86–92, 2016.

A. S. Zain and R. Purniawati, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Siswa Baru dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” Sains, Apl. Komputasi dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 18, 2020, doi: 10.30872/jsakti.v2i1.2668.

R. Y. Simanullang, Melisa, and Mesran, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan Covid 19 menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting ( SAW ),” Univ. Budi Darma, Medan, Indones., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2021.

Y. A. K. Ningtyas and D. A. Diartono, “Studi Perbandingan Metode SAW dan Metode AHP dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Kelayakan Calon Penerima Bantuan Progam Keluarga Harapan,” J. JTIK (Jurnal Teknol. Inf. dan Komunikasi), vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 587–596, 2024, doi: 10.35870/jtik.v8i3.2059.

R. Nisa, R. A. Yusda, and W. Handoko, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan menggunakan Metode Servqual untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Kinerja Aparatur Pemerintahan,” Edumatic J. Pendidik. Inform., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 257–266, 2023, doi: 10.29408/edumatic.v7i2.21240.

V. Mukhlis, Iqbal Ramadhani; Doduk, Thomas Aquino Berno; Rinjeni, Tri Puspa; Aulia, P. K. Rahma; Rahmawati, Rafika; Rahmawati, Tri Luhur Indayanti; Ananto, and N. Farista; Sembilu, “Penerapan Metode Weighted Product dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Program Penerimaan Bantuan Beras,” J. Ilmu Komput. dan Desain Komun. Vis., vol. 9, no. 2, 2024.

R. A. Setiawan, F. Fauziah, and R. T. Komala Sari, “Aplikasi Perbandingan Pemilihan Guru Private Homeschooling menggunakan Algoritma Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dan Weight Product Berbasis Web,” J. JTIK (Jurnal Teknol. Inf. dan Komunikasi), vol. 4, no. 2, p. 14, 2021, doi: 10.35870/jtik.v5i1.195.

M. H. Mardian, Demi; Neneng; Puspaningrum, Ajeng Savitri; Hasibuan, Alfiansyah;Tinambunan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Siswa Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode Weight Product (WP),” J. Inform. DAN REKAYASA PERANGKAT LUNAK, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 158–166, 2023, doi: 10.59832/jt.v5i1.341.

D. Zaelani, A. Sulistyohati, and S. Khotijah, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Siswa Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product pada SDIT Insan Madani,” J. Tera, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2025, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.undira.ac.id/index.php/jurnaltera/Page

C. R. Hidayat, T. Mufizar, and ..., “Implementasi metode weighted product (WP) pada sistem pendukung keputusan seleksi calon karyawan BPJS kesehatan tasikmalaya,” … Sist. Inf. …, pp. 8–9, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.atmaluhur.ac.id/index.php/knsi2018/article/view/411

R. Adiputra and B. Mulyawan, “Pembuatan Program Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Vendor ERP Pada PT Sinar Jaya Abadi Dengan Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product,” J. Ilmu Komput. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 181–181, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://journal.untar.ac.id/index.php/jiksi/article/view/2651

V. Amalia, “Jurnal Bina Komputer,” J. Bina Komput., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 122–132, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://eprints.binadarma.ac.id/11058/

M. A. S. Hasibuan, “ANALISIS DAN RANCANG BANGUN SISTEM INFORMASI AKADEMIK MENGGUNAKAN METODE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT LIFE CYCLE (SDLC),” J. Inform. Teknol. dan Sains, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 377–385, 2025.

S. Dewi, A. Perdana, P. Harliana, and N. M. Surbakti, “Perancangan Sistem Informasi Desa Bintang Sidikalang (Sidesta) Berbasis Web,” J-Intech, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 336–346, 2023, doi: 10.32664/j-intech.v11i2.1021.

L. Yoakim Telaumbanua, M. Afif Nashi Ulwan, S. Dewi, and K. Saputra S, “Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Akademik Robonesia Untuk Meningkatkan Pembelajaran Di Bidang Robotik,” JATI (Jurnal Mhs. Tek. Inform., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 6062–6070, 2025, doi: 10.36040/jati.v9i4.13959.

P. Yudiani, “Jurnal Matematika , Komputasi dan Statistika ISSN : 2503 – 2984 MODEL SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING ( MADM ) DENGAN PENDEKATAN METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING ( Studi Kasus : Penentuan Pegawai Teladan Bidang Perumahan di D,” vol. 4, no. Employee 1, pp. 710–717, 2024.

K. M. Sukiakhy and C. V. R. Jummi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Objek Wisata Aceh Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw),” J. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 74–80, 2021, doi: 10.35508/jicon.v9i1.3835.

A. Kadim, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Laptop Menggunakan Model FMADM (Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making) dengan Metode Weighted Product (WP),” J. Multimed. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 4, no. 02, pp. 83–91, 2022, doi: 10.54209/jatilima.v4i02.331.

N. Wijaya, K. Lie, M. Akbar, Q. P. Effendy, and D. F. A. Hariyadi, “Optimalisasi Pemilihan Smartphone Berbasis AI Tahun 2025 Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan,” Digit. Transform. Technol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 107–114, 2025, doi: 10.47709/digitech.v5i1.5855.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Comparative Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting and Weighted Product Methods for Faculty Integrity Zone Ranking. (2025). Proceedings of The International Conference on Computer Science, Engineering, Social Science, and Multi-Disciplinary Studies, 1, 747-752. https://doi.org/10.64803/cessmuds.v1.157